I'm a doctor, I confess I'm not sure I know the roles, the meaning, history, or the user name of the Academy of Medicine.
At a time when this term is denatured by prestigious television programs of the highest level where we see all kinds of academy ("nine" several years ago which served as a recycling of has-been comedy, "stars "currently used for recycling never-has-beens) I think however that this Hall of medicine must be good and great institution .... in the same vein as the Great Academy French: a gathering of "wise old men", I use that term without irony, but in a more anthropological pleonasm where wisdom and age are considered to go hand in hand!
past two-three days, the media talk a lot of evasiveness and always too brief a report of the Academy of Medicine that I will like to get, who will talk about adoption, especially to facilitate steps ....
Surprise ... Moreover, from a little every adoption specialists who discover this project as everyone through the media ....
The CSA, which is nonetheless the central adoption and the agency responsible for improving the subject has not been contacted .... but to the great anger of many members of the CSA we have been very little consultation, as a CSA in the earthquake of Haiti, and what ensued!
So, a little surprised when we hear that the Academy of Medicine criticized the length of the adoption process .... Is this their problem?
.... in fact, as and when items are recovered in fragments, it seems that the Academy of Medicine blends well his own business, because what she is talking about child abuse and length (One year) of unselfishness manifest biological families, before either made a withdrawal of parental rights.
I'm maybe not quite agree to the reduction of that period which I find useful in some cases where parents attached to their child but in great distress (social or psychological) may need this time to back on their feet again and be able to "secure ".... by cons to go in the same direction and throwing another stone in the pond: I'm sick of these laws that are never (or almost applied) and the Academy of Medicine is right to point the finger, The enormous difference between the number of children in neglect, and those that can be adopted. About 1% of child abuse and neglect are adopted, I hope that many of them have other security measures: the placement of foster caring, or even loving, investments in the relatives, investments in institutions (here, I twist the nose already very strong, because although I hope that institutions are of good quality, it is never the ideal place for a child especially in the long term!).
Academy of Medicine will concentrate on the plight of unfortunate children, and it quite a role, I very much to shake the coconut. This is also the role of each of us, our whole society to be concerned about the welfare of children, social deprivation, economic exists, but much worse moral distress is terrible, we will never be among Bears but every smile given to a child is a great victory, and each unhappy child makes me sad and makes me want to beat me, here in France, Madagascar ( you have recognized the photo that had disrupted the meeting ) or anywhere in the world.
A large shade, the capital, important, who will make me not only friends, but which is essential to clarify for my ethical
This article is finally NOT SUBJECT TO THE ADOPTION, it has nothing to do with the fact that we are in a period of funnel (many demands and little offers on adoption). We're talking about the unhappy childhood in which the adoption can be a solution. The aim of adopting it must be remembered is to provide a family with a child and not the opposite, gnan-gnan said, but crucial to repeat from time to time! If
through adoption, adoptive families are also happy, even better, because it is still more happy, and it allows small adopted to feel safe in a "compost". But the pediatrician
sorry that I am thinking above all poor children, fighting even more expensive and useful than adoption.
