Friday, October 19, 2007

Costumes Poofy Dresses

representations


300

: philosophical and semantic analysis of the film The film

300

has welcomed over one million five hundred thousand entries in France. This peplum based on Frank Miller comic of the same name (also author of Sin City


appears to have advantages for its beauty and vitality. Yet, although one would complain about the weakness of the script and predictability of the rebound,


300 offers a brilliant view of a pedagogical point of view. Indeed, the ancient philosophy has been fully respected and emphasized its uniqueness vis-à-vis the antithesis of Sparta: The Persian Empire . After our gaze lingered on the paradigm Veterans and their Persian enemies, we will try to overturn a misleading first impression on the political significance of this work.
When we approach the objectivist approach, we must understand that this is a reading grid centered on the object studied. It was much later that the idea we have of the object is at the heart of the analysis, we then speak of subjectivity (the subject is at the center). In ancient philosophy, man is passive, contemplative. Not only the world but also society, the city predate him. The right is in things, in objects that surround him, they are an inseparable part. Man may try to decipher the nature of things but will not develop a general model for understanding: in physics aristotiélicienne, the stone falls because it "loves the earth." Likewise, natural phenomena are driven by the will of the gods, secured to objects. The Latin scholars are familiar with the mnemonic: "In every tree lurks a nymph in every river a bearded god." There is talk of confusion between being and ought to be: the right thing because it coincides with what is of consciousness, an intellectual journey. Truth is objective, man can not depart from it.
For St. Thomas Aquinas, who will relay the ancient philosophy of Christian Middle Ages (especially in the ninth to twelfth century), God only acts as a power orderly, not like any power (in this he s opposes the affirmative fransciscains like William of Ockham). In the wild, so there are standards that guide the behavior of men under the command of God and it can detect by using his reason. It is his duty to comply.
approach of Veterans State follows: nature provides that social animals are organized into family units, which are themselves hierarchical. These families will aggregate into larger assemblies due to intrinsic causes (population growth) or extrinsic (wars, famines, natural disasters). Another cause of the organization can result in conditions for the development of civilization. For example, choosing to settle generally creates loan networks seeding in case of problems, the Egyptians will centrally manage the flood of the Nile waters (see the Chinese development model around their greatest rivers). It is the nature of the organization that determines the rules on a case by case (casuistic).
Sparta is a city warrior, as ruthless with the enemy with his own. A eugenic process occurs at birth (the constitution of the individual allows it to fit or not, deserves the Christian has no place here), and the hardships endured by young males are extremely demanding . No exceptions, not even for the King Leonidas: the individual gives way to the rules arising from the group.
On the other hand, and intervening early in the film, the Persian Empire follows a different vision. In philosophy, we can speak of voluntarism. II Voluntarism Universalist Persian It's the look on old Persian civilization that is relevant: this brilliant civilization is an aggregate of kingdoms submitted by Xerxes. The god-emperor's ambition to dominate the world as well. While Sparta wants to make an exception, the Empire has a universal vocation. That's where the clash occurs. Ancient Philosophy does not contemplate the universality of a model but provides a grid of understanding of the standards of any model that could arise. Xerxes divine avatar, may instead substitute its will on the natural order of things. As for King of the Little Prince, the fact that it is not really totipotent forced him to call, but the legitimacy of his command is not from the Being, but the supremacy of its authority.
When the messenger of Xerxes appears threatening against Sparta, he disrespect to the queen, he meets his own standards. Leonidas does not support the insult and pushed back towards a well. The messenger reminds international customs: the immunity of diplomats, He said that the conduct of the king is madness. Leonidas responds before finishing him and his guard: "Folly? Sparta is here!" Casuistry does not bother other customs, even international. In Rome, has now in Rome.

Ephialtes or III instead of the abnormal

Ephialtes is a crucial character in the film.

deformed, his parents refuse to sacrifice of his birth and raise outside the city walls. It can find its place among the Spartan phalanx, because of his disability. Its nature is the law arising out of the Spartan society objectively.

Xerxes will welcome and allow him to take revenge on those who have rejected it. Against the promise of earthly pleasures and a Persian army uniform, Ephialtes indicates a secret path that will take the Orientals
300
rear. However Xerxes Leonidas leaves the possibility of escape, but he and his followers refuse to get in contravention of the Act. Again, the whole outweighs the individual in a burst of complicity with the totalitarian. However

opposite the Greeks, the empire is no more morally bondable: Kelsen criticized the voluntarism of the Third Reich as devoid of basic norm (the constitution) binding to the will of the executive, leaving discretion to conduct arbitrary requirement (covered by the theories of James Austin).

By committing suicide, Ephialtes does not owe its acceptance of an act of will, but would forever frustrated recognition of merit. A very human dilemma.

IV Clash of Civilizations upside



300 provides two degrees of political reading.

the first stage, the West is Sparta, the East and the Muslim world from Persia. He would then understand that the West must buttress its values, not to give an inch to the barbarous enemy, which demands nothing of its soldier or fighting skills, nor honors, but simply submission and sacrifice. He should also understand that this task is the least degenerate of them: the Americans who are dedicated to defending the ideals of the West have at their side as allies weak and invested. The last scene of the movie would then show the usefulness of this undertaking, when the load of the Greeks against the Persian army, "only" one against three this time. It seems that this thesis defended by Frank Miller, which has heightened a debate in my opinion based.

the second degree is the opposite message in front of us. The Persian Empire is universalist. He wants to impose its model to other nations. As the time of colonization, were not asked often little subject peoples: a passage (Suez, Gibraltar), a beachhead, or natural resources. However, imposing a toll, forcing Xerxes Leonidas to follow her doctrine of submission, appeasement for Sparta against its criteria, since the Athenians less belligerent and homosexuals have refused without consequence. In this second vision, we become the Persians, wishing to impose a democracy ready to use, a standard that does not match the course adopted by our organization overlooked. The
300
become fanatical warriors, just as sacrificial who oppose the West, represented by its army, its culture (its influances), or even its existence.
In conclusion, despite a single frame,
300 is a film that portrays a Manichean historical reality and contemporary politics less simple than it seems. The contribution to the spectator a philosophical point of view remains implicit but real but should have insisted on the delicate exercise of role reversal.


http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L% C3% A9onidas_Ier_de_Sparte



http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_% 28film% 29

http://www .denistouret.fr / ideologues / Kelsen.html

http://www.denistouret.fr/geopolitique/Aquin.html

http://www.denistouret.fr/ideologues/Aristote.html

http://www.denistouret.fr/droitsoc/

Images:

http://www.fichesducinema.com/spip/IMG/jpg/300-t.jpg

http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/300/05.jpg
TRACKBACK URL:
http://www.agoravox.fr/tb_receive.php3?id_article=23011

Friday, October 5, 2007

Machine Wash Duffel Bag

proactive contribution to the Grenelle Environment





This article is in reaction to the article Our government poses new threats to freedom of expression and Internet ... From

Quitterie Delmas responsible UDF.

First of all I would like to thank Quitterie Delmas (UDF representative) for daring to speak of fundamental freedoms. The subject seems outdated for our politicians, above Executive (thus also too often over the legislature), yet you have to realize that people are susceptible. Then I react as author of a thesis on the result Article Delmas addressing three separate projects, we respectrons order she has chosen for the sake of lisibilté. I refer to his article rich links.


Tessier 1 Report on the digital press asked the Minister Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres (19 February 2007) First, I will probably surprising given that the indictment against them was led by Ms. Delmas, I have nothing against the labels, nor against "contracts to improve quality " (roughly: labels developed in consultation with State and distinguished by the mark" Approved ").
To put it simply,

labels are certifications that meet the specifications, provided by a private or public, laying its specifications freely. The control is effected against payment, and the credibility of the organization depends directly on its rigor (with the risk of concealment and corruption that entails, of course). Here, no one is forced to join the label. Do not have a label does not discriminate. In short, it pulls up without running those outside the system (no one will find fault with when there will be labels "GMO free", the consumer must be confident and choose wisely, and he or not to grant confidence to a particular label).
risks emerge when questions about the probity of the controller occur, or that obtaining a mark qualifies for a grant (this is pure cronyism that plagues all parties, including the UDF), or the failure to obtain a label entails a risk to perrenité Site (Prohibition, etc. ...).
In any case, I find the idea very good, but I consider that the private sector must play a crucial role in this normalization, and unlabelled sites should not suffer financial or legal consequence against them (let the user decide).

It seems to me that the credibility of an article already depends links and references made therein, just as in academic work. On Agoravox, the most popular items taken over rated are generally better documented (eg Articles of
Forest Ent
) and so on of the best).
short labeling could be a problem, but should not be a ... except if the libraries, documentation centers, halls, Internet cafes and allow navigation as with labeled sites. Stop there: I do not want to give ideas that I would not like to see implemented.

2 Bill on the Prevention of Crime (February 13, 2007)

Regarding the draft law on the prevention of delinquency, do you think does it not strange that this happens just before the election?
And if it was to prevent that from being buzzées police violence that might follow the election? Or fight against video surveillance
reversed
made possible by new technologies?

It of course has nothing to do with the "cowboy attitude" that prevails among the police, who tend more towards the model of SWAT
...



3 Draft decree for the establishment of a Commission of Ethics of the Internet (January 31, 2007)

This is again a potential hazard only. what will the real impact of this certification, or refusal to label? That is the question that must be answered to understand how power will be given to this body, you guessed it, political.
Parents will they use this as a reference accéditation?

ISPs they took refuge there when their liability will be challenged from all sides?
And what about the government, cyber cafes, community access (such as free WiFi networks cooperative
that are springing up everywhere)?


Conclusion:

short, you'll understand the overall strategy is opaque, yet simple: No one


Safe Harbor, the U.S., to limit the civil and criminal liability of ISPs , servers, hosts.

2 Multiplication and responsibilities offenses, at all levels.

3 "Those who are to blame" will be much more visible: they will be denied their label, or accreditation.
4 Passage of legislation making everyone guilty or almost (88% of the French in 2005 had copied music at home, and the trend logic is on the rise). 5
knocking fast and hard on the wallet suppliers of resources, giving them the opportunity to clear themselves if they remain quietly in the box that the State has mapped out for them.

6 The synergy between guilt and all law enforcement capabilities allows executables to appoint a Justice overwhelmed targets to shoot at the head.
short, a devilishly effective strategy.
We are witnessing a process of destruction of original

Fundamental Rights: the citizen is allowed to freely cons of money or security. If certain fundamental rights concern only those who surrender (eg the sale of its privacy cons of vouchers by the system of loyalty cards in department stores), others are unique because only exist if all have use. We could prevent most attacks on civil liberties that threaten us. In granting any credit for labeling, counting more on our minds than on a critical third-party certification ...
The real danger is to end there: the exclusion of fundamental freedoms of the public debate, dare I say the concerns of citizens (in this reality TV has played role). Resist this erosion is the concern of everyone, and everyone's business. Thank
Delmas have contributed this article to return to the front of the stage.

Image Credit: Reporters Without Borders. http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://www.rsf.org/IMG/jpg/Chine_Hu_Castro_moyen3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.rsf.org/imprimer.php3% 3D11893 &% 3Fid_article amp; amp; h = 279 & w = 450 & sz = 78 & hl = en & start = 1 & tbnid = mgh0MIC2CXZk-M & amp; TBNH = 79 & tbnw = 127 & prev = / images% 3Fq% 3Dlibert% 25C3 % 25A9% 2BD% 2B% 26svnum% 2527expression% 3D10% 26hl% 3Den% 26client%-a% 26rls 3Dfirefox% 3Dorg.mozilla: fr: official% 26sa% 3DG