Over Bite Lingual Braces

300: Philosophical analysis and semantic Film





Causes and consequences of a referendum Pro or Anti Sarkozy in April 2007





- M'sieur the Mayor, so that's what a bibiscite?

- is a Latin word that means yes. (Drawing by Honoré Daumier and legend)

campaign Nicolas Sarkozy seems to unfold like clockwork. Besides the media reported in chorus the term "sacred" or induction to talk about his triumphant nomination to the position of the UMP candidate for 2007 presidential elections. Needless to defend the hypothesis of the plot: pictures and a press release that chew the work and gregariousness foolproof enough though.

N. Sarkozy is omnipresent, in part because of the rules of media coverage (1 / 3 Government, 1 / 3 majority, 1 / 3 opposition), and partly due to hyperactivity of the UMP candidate and his supporters to relay within the media (see the Zapping on Monday, January 29 http://www.canalplus.fr/ ). This central position turns Presidential election into a referendum for or against Sarkozy, risky strategy because his camp already being unanimously welded around his face, he would now capture the undecided rather than reinforce his image as candidate of the Right safely and economically liberal. This referendum is a deliberate strategy

N. Sarkozy ("I want to make this election a referendum," he said in a statement clarifying its campaign strategy).
S. Royal also grows in this sense: she embodies the useful vote, and virtually nothing else. In fact it plays the bullfighters, making himself always see clearly without disclosing his proposals, and distinguishing itself as much as possible of any action concrete of the socialist project. It remains to Royal that his method (participatory democracy, and the highest maternal bosom of the state), and now its proverbial stupidity at its international travel (Middle East, China, Quebec). The candidate of the Right brand him a little more each day the project. Whether we approve or not, can not be faulted for lacking consistency. Some say he exposed too.

In reality the two candidates media darlings have co-opted. "Sarko" knew he was more than capable of rolling on the bottom, when "Sego" had chosen the undertaker

mitt that unites his troops.

Bayrou him
captures Democrats unhappy alternations
UMP-PS, and time passing, the candidate finally advance his proposals. He rose rapidly in the polls, the indifference of its strategic adversaries. Given its position, it will crop to benefit from votes than Royal Sarkozy, even if no candidate Chirac did this. The UDF is now inevitable and force a citizen to question the training and its candidate. In all likelihood, a Bayrou in the second round should win the election. The application unit
illiberal it is decaying.

OF bulky pans make a noise which severely hampers the subject of this "referendum".
The real Achilles heel of the candidate of the Right is the clique of plutocrats: tax evaders, they were hereditary, or the new rich doing an about face on the extreme difficulty they have had to pull out to their environment, or even the MEDEF in terms of bad faith and denial of representation of its members (for heavier) has no master. Worse, the extreme mediocrity of his supporters whose zeal may have devastating consequences. Face a sidereal space (including the vote that allows extreme dream about the big night), the Right is better able to fight the Right.

In view of this "referendum" (but we should talk about becoming popularized), where N Sarkozy wants to support his political will, support each annoying is a dangerous dead weight: "Guard me from my friends, my enemies I'll do it!" (A king of Macedonia, taken up by Voltaire)


http://www.sarkozy.fr/video/? IntChannelId = 17